Home > Web Development > dcomments.blogs.m.mashable  [ Add to favorite]  Print Message

Wanna Beat Piracy? You Have to Do Better Than Them!


sharing

Is piracy killing the record industry, or is the record industry just too slow and inert to adapt to the way business should be run nowadays, and that is online? My vote goes to the latter; in fact, I think they aren’t even trying hard enough.

An interesting article from Torrentfreak tells the story of a German indie record label Dependent Records which was forced to shut down and then decided to upload its entire catalogue to The Pirate Bay.

Interestingly enough, the company’s CEO Stefan Herwig claims that Dependent Records was forced to shut down mostly because of piracy, and that indie record labels are the ones which are struck by piracy the most. ?A popular claim often seen on Internet fora maintains that the P2P culture weakens the majors and bolsters the independent labels. This is, we can assure you, 100% bullshit,” he says. He’s angry but not bitter, though; he seems to think of this as the natural course of events, and thus he decided that the least he can do to make his music available to the public is offer his label’s catalogue freely on The Pirate Bay.

I do not agree, however, with Herwig’s assertion that the main reason for his company’s demise is because “there are simply too many people who enjoy our bands and their songs who do not wish to pay for them.” The problem of record companies - especially small, indie ones - is not that people don’t want to pay; it’s availability. An average user simply doesn’t have the time to walk from one small record store to the other and search for new records; especially since new albums are often available on the internet weeks before they physically come to the store.

Big stores at least offer a wide variety of products, so you can hope to find most of what you’re looking for in one place. But small record stores, as cute as they are, are simply too much hassle compared to the armchair-shopping that the internet offers. The indies thus are forced to change their business model even more than large record companies. If you’re thinking of starting a record label/store today, the first thing on your mind should be an online shop; and this online shop has to be at least as easy to use as The Pirate Bay.

One important thing here that the entertainment industry doesn’t understand, is how piracy works. Piracy works very, very well. The albums and videos and movies come quickly; they’re thoroughly checked by the community, they’re well organized, they have standards of quality, and they’re free. To beat that, you need to offer content that’s just as fast, just as good, just as organized, and then give something extra to compensate for the “free” part: higher quality bitrates, extra digital content, extra physical content (shirts, concert tickets, coupons). You can’t miss out any of these elements because your content will ultimately be worse than the stuff on Mininova or The Pirate Bay.

Not realizing this, the industry stabs itself in the foot. They add those annoying “piracy is a crime” trailers to DVDs which you can’t skip and which just make you go and download the XviD version. They add DRM and rootkits to their media which makes pirated content, well, a 100 times better than theirs simply because it’s annoyance-free. They often have crappy online shops and support some weird media formats instead of using what most people use. Their content, simply put, sucks compared to pirated content.

Ultimately, I think the “free” element of piracy is not crucial. It’s the fantastic organization, speed and quality that piracy offers that makes most people download pirated content. If the entertainment industry - movie studios and record labels, big or small - should offer content that has the same quality as the pirated content; and perhaps even strive to offer just a tiny bit more, they’d see their profits surge.

[image credits: wickedwhammy.com]

ShareThis


Mon,
11 Feb 2008
Original article here
 
 
feed icon
In today's economy where money seems to be worth less and less every day, gas seems to cost more and more every day, more and more people can't afford to pay for things like movie tickets and music. Humans seem to need (or at least be addicted to) art (even bad art). So if they can't afford to pay full price they make the smart business choice and go for the cheapest price they can find. It's OK for record executives to make the most money they can, but it's not OK for the consumer to save as much money as they can. This seems unfair since, record company executives make more money than their acts and the CDs they put out mostly suck. Why are they rich off of generally sucking when they could and should just be scraping by? The solution to me is obvious: the record companies need to make less money and offer more value. If you want to continue charging $15 for a CD, then make it worth it. Make sure all the songs on it are good. Include cool premiums, like keychains, toys or other cool items. I disagree with Stan's suggestion to add more digital content since it will be pirated along with the music. The extra stuff has to be only available by buying it in stores. I do agree that evolution is the key here-like it or not, the consumeristic environment is changing. Evolve or die, sadly. Complaining that consumers are "greedy" or "selfish" or "disrespectful to the property of others" won't change the fact that consumers are reacting to their own environments and adapting. They don't want to go without so they're evolving, too. I'm sure everyone wants their favorite bands to survive and feed their families. But don't blame "pirates" for not wanting to pay what, to many, are absurd prices for generally lackluster product. Wasn't it Radiohead, just last year, who made more money letting consumers pay what they wanted than they would have if they'd released their CD in stores? Stop defending the old ways and let's all evolve together. Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
I just love this free music Utopia that valley types want us to live in. A world where Bands can buy equipment and get studio time for free, A world were every artist can and will have the money and venues to tour and every freedownloader will show up an buy a concert ticket. A world were tshirt sales will be enough to feed the families of a 5 member Band with a few hundred fans. Look lets be honest it does hurt the small artist more then the big ones, I work in the hiphop industry and its a double edge sword i have seen downloading cripple the sales of some quality artist and its because those that seem to dig them tend to be a lil more web savvy and have bought into the hole they make money at shows thing. Well where do you think the money for those tours come from? At the same time you get people like Solider Boy that gets huge because of youtube and does good numbers mostly due to ringtones. Downloading didn't help him and it didn't hurt him either. Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
[…] Wanna Beat Piracy? You Have to Do Better Than Them!: "One important thing here that the entertainment industry doesn’t understand, is how piracy works. Piracy works very, very well. The albums and videos and movies come quickly; they’re thoroughly checked by the community, they’re well organized, they have standards of quality, and they’re free. To beat that, you need to offer content that’s just as fast, just as good, just as organized, and then give something extra to compensate for the ‘free’ part: higher quality bitrates, extra digital content, extra physical content (shirts, concert tickets, coupons). You can’t miss out any of these elements because your content will ultimately be worse than the stuff on Mininova or The Pirate Bay." SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "When Pirates Get it Right…Perhaps We Should Pay Attention?", url: "http://www.jazzodyssey.com/when-pirates-get-it-rightperhaps-we-should-pay-attention/" }); […] Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
Record labels are missing the burden of archiving music that is purchased. End users are terrible at maintaining permanent archives of things they bought. How many people have effective backups of important pictures that they have taken with their digital cameras? You buy music, load it into an iPod. Lose the iPod. Now what? Your hard disk crashes, you buy another PC, etc. It is very easy to lose the music you paid for. If you lose it you have to buy it again. The cost of the user maintaining the archival copy greatly raises the effective cost of buying the music. Compare this to downloading. If you don't like something just delete it. You can always download it again later. If you lose your device, no big deal, just download again. No DRM issues when you switch MP3 players too. k Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
Another view. I know the business model wasn't playing by the rules but AllOfMp3.com worked while you could actually get money into it. One of the problems here is that the existing stores don't sell the product we actually want to buy at a price that we think the product is worth. Properly tagged and filenamed MP3s in LAME 192K VBR at $0.10 to $0.25 per track. I believe there is a product that can compete with free, but it's not what ITunes and Amazon are giving us. Maybe the Indies should band together and rebuild an official AllOfMp3? Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
Just as there will always be those who do not respect others, the law, private property, there will always be some degree of piracy. This is sad for the creator because it robs existing work and it stifles potential for new music as well. No real money will be invested in a product that is largely taken rather than purchased as intended, and so it is the new artist we'll never hear about who loses along with the general public. Now we see in the headlines that the gaming industry is being gutted out along with music and movies, so stop kidding yourself that "added value" and better quality will drive purchases. The better quality will just be pirated as well. This was never about payback to a profitable industry, or punishment for placing revenue stream on par with the creation of art. This is a bunch of poorly raised individuals with little class and even less conscience who will take a product without paying that they know is properly for sale as long as technology facilitates them to do just that. The legacy of online pirates will be a very slowed and filtered network blanketed with regulation and law enforcement at the choke points. Pirates, in retrospect, will be responsible for ruining what was once a fast, clean and very cool network. Thanks, folks. "Music revolution" your ass. Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
Go back to this site and your find the following statement … Update: We received a response from Dependent Records’ Lothar, who wrote us: “We never decided anything like that. The offer is completely illegal.The Person who create an account with the nickname Stefan_Herwig has absolutely nothing to do with our label owner of the same name.” Obviously the uploader did have access to the entire catalog of the label, interesting… Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
If buying stuff online (with a credit card or any other way) was really, really simple - which often isn't the case these days - then the actual money would not be such a big deal. How do you think iTunes manages to make a profit? Because it works well, integrates with your mobile device fantastically, and is very easy to use. I'm well aware that the majors are making it even harder for indies to prosper, but that's not the fault of piracy, is it? Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
At the moment of writing this, in the UK, the only place I can conveniently shop for a wide range digital music online is the iTunes store, which sells (mostly) DRM protected tracks. Sure - many individual labels sell music directly from their sites, but not enough sell tracks in the only useful format (mp3), without DRM and offering a good user experience. When the Amazon music store opens it will change the game completely, offering a place where users can quickly, easily and legally download music for a reasonable price. It's always been convenient to shop for both major label and indie CDs on Amazon and when the same convenience is applied to digital music it will be a huge boost to sales. Hopefully it will be the first serious alternative to piracy. Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
Tired arguments. I've owned and run an Indie Label, and you're simply wrong. The reason Pirate Bay is easier to use than an Indie-Online store is because it doesn't require a credit card. What part of that don't you get? To sue a more extreme example to make a point: it's like blaming the girl who got assaulted by saying she shouldn't have worn such a short skirt, or telling the beaten man he shouldn't have been in that neighborhood at that time of the day. Most indies would prefer to have good distribution into the big stores and catalogues, but of course that is what the majors purged first in an effort to control the market. So to say "they should have better distribution" is like telling a failed start-up "well, you should have had more capital." No duh! But hey, I know piracy is cool and fashionable. I'll say it again, like lots of people before me: a new system will not come from indie labels, their job is to find and enable new talent. Nor will all artists suddenly start self-publishing, regardless of how easy it is. In the mean time, please enjoy the new Miley Cyrus album. It's the only viable scalable musical product available until cool people realize downloading is called piracy for a reason. Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
[…] articolul scris astazi si intitulat "Wanna Beat Piracy? You Have to Do Better Than Them!" li se spune celor care te baga la inchisoare pentru ca ti-ai downloadat un mp3, mare si […] Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
Does anyone have numbers on beatport.com? As an electronic music fan I find this site a great place to buy music from known artists and discover new talent. The top download list is a great example on how new and old talent are doing good. (if the list isn't fixed…) Now if they could change the green color… Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
thepete said: "Wasn't it Radiohead, just last year, who made more money letting consumers pay what they wanted than they would have if they'd released their CD in stores? Stop defending the old ways and let's all evolve together." Radioheads experiment, when viewed from the inside of the industry (I am) is as cruel and hypocritical as it gets. The industry invested millions and millions in Radiohead for well over eleven years to help make them a household name, and then they backstabbed the very company that helped make them who they are. Worse, it is only their name recognition from industry money and marketing that allowed them to do this in the first place, while they set a now impossible standard for any new musician to compete with. Fuck RadioHead. They hurt the hope of new music to make a few bucks for themselves. Their selfishness has made them part of the problem, now. Music gets back on track when we all "evolve" back to basic morals and human decency, Pete. The industry can charge whatever they wish and we can elect to pay it or not, but while "not" is our free choice, it also means doing without just as it does in any other business or industry. No amount of your rationalization makes piracy right. This is a temporary moral aberration that will be corrected with legislation and heavy handed enforcement. No government on earth is going to allow the exciting promise of online commerce (and the taxes it will eventually bear) to evaporate because of a bunch of sticky fingered, shallow minded tightwads. Taking something you know is properly for sale but paying nothing because you can hide behind technology is cowardly and wrong. This was never really all that complicated. Technology simply got out ahead of legislation and enforcement for awhile. They are rapidly catching up now and although geeks will always find a way, punishments will rise until they get insanely ugly as an effective deterrent. This is a ransacking of 50 years of recording artist's work, and the payback is going to be a bitch. Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
[…] industry itself blames illegal downloading, but I like this entry at Mashable. One important thing here that the entertainment industry doesn’t understand, is how piracy […] Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
thepete, the clichée of rich record executives is laughable, and frankly juvenile. There may be a 100 rich record executives, but tens thousands of general shmoes in the industry who design album art, work on promotional stuff, operate recording equipment, etcetera ad nauseum… it's these people that end up with less work, not the few executives. Do you actually know what a record exec looks like? Do you really think it's a greased-hair guy in an Italian suit and a cigar in the corner of his mouth as he speeds along Sunset Blvd in a convertible? LOL. Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
"The reason Pirate Bay is easier to use than an Indie-Online store is because it doesn't require a credit card." I have a deep love for Amazon.com… except for their music store. It sucks, is frustrating, and I have yet to successfully download one thing from it. This has nothing to do with a credit card, or being a small indie company with no resources for a better store. Buying music downloads legally is actually fairly annoying, and it has nothing to do with credit cards. It frustrates me to no end that the easiest way for me to legally get the new Flogging Molly album (Float, out March 4th!… end shameless plug for my favorite band) will be to buy the CD and rip the files myself. Oh wait… the RIAA is frowning on me doing that now… which part of purchasing music legally was the easy part again? Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
So, by deciding to take control of their own destiny, they "backstabbed" the company? Were they to sit around and tow the company line until their end days because they owed a debt of gratitude to their label? Couldn't the same argument be used against any band that changes labels for a better deal? It was their previous company who built their name, and the band went elsewhere, leaving the original company with nothing. Has every band that has ever changed labels been viewed with the same critical eye? What about when Prince decided to leave his label and take over his own distribution? Under your view, once a band signs with a label, that's it, they are to bow to their record label masters and sing their praises endlessly. Too bad. Times change, business models change, and bands who started off as small acts grow up and get a head on their shoulders as to how business works. The current record industry business model is outdated and broken, and if they don't find a way to fix it, and soon, all that is going to be a bunch of guys sitting around 55-gallon drums with a fire on it saying "We wouldn't be here if it wasn't for those hypocrites!" Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
[…] the space to revisit it or review the dvd. What do you do with it?  Might as well make some money. Mashable.com provides one of the most ration reason why piracy does work.   "The albums and videos and movies come quickly; they’re thoroughly checked by the […] Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
[…] said it in the past, and I'll say it again: so called "pirates" are actually doing a very good job at […] Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
[…] said it in the past, and I’ll say it again: so called “pirates” are actually doing a very good job at […] Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
[…] Wanna Beat Piracy? You Have to Do Better Than Them! To beat that, you need to offer content that?s just as fast, just as good, …. You buy music, load it into an iPod. Lose the iPod. Now what? […] Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
[…] said it in the past, and I'll say it again: so called "pirates" are actually doing a very good job at […] Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
[…] scenario, I don't see how this model could ever be fair, just, or sensible. As I've said many times before, the entertainment industry must start offering more, not less, tieing scarce goods - concert […] Mon,
11 Feb 2008
 
 
feed icon
[…] scenario, I don't see how this model could ever be fair, just, or sensible. As I've said many times before, the entertainment industry must start offering more, not less, tieing scarce goods - concert […] Mon,
11 Feb 2008